Album Reviews, Music

Review: Face to Face – Three Chords And a Half Truth

It’s been a pretty fascinating ride for Victorville punk rockers Face to Face. The band’s trademark melodic punk rock took them from the small California town to the then heights of endless KROQ rotation and MTV’s Jon Stewart Show. They rode their ability to turn melodic punk into a near art form, and unlike their predecessors Bad Religion and their kind, Trever Keith’s song writing leaned more on his emotive lyricism than say political anarchy. His heart was firmly on his sleeve and through songs like “I Want”, “Don’t Turn Away” and “Disconnected”, Face to Face became the preeminent force behind emotionally charged melodic punk that managed to sway clear of the trappings of what eventuated into “emo”. Yet, while they remained on the forefront of this genre, they’ve never really had the stability that comes with finding a long term recording home. Face to Face has been through more record labels than the number of albums they’ve released. They’ve had the goods to break into the mainstream (1996’s Face to Face was as big of a rock album as you were ever going to get without them sounding like Green Day) but have never really quite reached the levels they seemingly wanted to achieve. But through it all, the one thing that has remained consistent is the band’s ability to write great songs in whatever variation of punk/rock they’ve conceived.

Their latest, Three Chords and a Half Truth, finds the band on Rise Records (their 9th), deviating away from the breakneck melodic punk rock their pedigree was built on for a more rockabilly, rock n’ roll twist. And while their post-hiatus album (2011’s Laugh Now, Laugh Later) was a more by-the-numbers affair, Three Chords… breaks away from them into Social Distortion territory with touches of The Clash. It’s clear then, that Keith and company aren’t interested in writing another Don’t Turn Away and instead, ease into an album that could have easily been the follow up to How To Ruin Everything. There are more mid tempo pieces, more blues influences, and more foot-tapping melodies than anything they’ve written before. From the stomping opening of “123 Drop” to the horn-section (yes) infused “Welcome Back to Nothing”, Three Chords… will surely polarize fans expecting something familiar.

They have of course, done something like this before. After releasing their A&M Records debut in 1996, they went and released Ignorance is Bliss, a polarizing record if there were ever one. Three Chords probably isn’t as divisive as Ignorance, but songs like the 50’s swing influenced “Marked Man” and the rockabilly tinged “First Step, Misstep” are actually more contrasting (musically) to “Disconnected” than, say, “Burden” or “Everyone Hates a Know-it-all”. They do delve back into the old playbook once or twice, “Smokestacks and Skyscrapers  is a fantastic melody-driven song that could easily fit next to anything on Big Choice. While singles “Right As Rain” and “Bright Lights Go Down” owe more to their earlier material or at the very least, music from their Vagrant-era.

The most telling aspect of Three Chords is how comfortable they sound with their new material. There was a certain awkwardness to Ignorance Is Bliss (for the record, I do really like that album), and their please-the-fans follow-up Reactionary was even worse. But here, they sound complete; like natural progression. So perhaps the band, having long mastered the style in which they became synonymous for, have found the next logical evolution of their craft. It isn’t as raw as a Social Distortion record, not so whiskey-soaked and down trodden, but there is a real belief here. And while older fans will probably be a little disappointed by its lack of pace, the album is a definite step forward. (Rise Records)

 

Standard
Television

Jon Stewart tells Larry King CNN is “terrible”

Jon Stewart’s response to Larry King’s rather innocuous question of why Stewart “picks on CNN so much” was as simple as it was profound;

You’re terrible

Thus concluding CNN’s plodding grasp of its gargantuan potential in today’s world, limping behind rival networks as it tries to position itself in ratings battles instead of being a global difference maker. Stewart’s stand in saying that CNN is less of a voice than it is merely a microphone is really at the heart of the issue;

I think CNN has a — an opportunity to be a real arbiter. But being a real arbiter means taking a stand, not just having people on — you’re on the left, you’re on the right. That’s like having people on in the cola wars. You’re from Pepsi; you’re from Coke. What do you think? I think we taste great. I think we taste great. That’s all the time we have.”

He goes on to say that while he does not agree with the politics or the irresponsibility of FOX News, they are at the very least “brilliantly authoritative” and that they “know what they’re doing” and that the bottom line for CNN is that they are simply, “squandered opportunity.”

Through the early days of CNN, global audiences were captivated by its 24-hour news service- the only one in the world at the time. It’s reach and broadcast were held in high regard and for consumers like myself who spent a great deal of time in Southeast Asia, CNN was the world brought to you. However, with the rise of highly editorialized and opinionated media, CNN failed to see the draw and allure of of such methodology, giving rise to FOX News and its slanted posturing.

Is plain old news just too boring in this day and age? Do audiences prefer highly editorialized communication with its requisite bells and whistles? Perhaps audiences in this modern age like to hear viewpoints that are both strong and opinionated but at the same time, clearly voiced in an ideologue.

It is a shame because Stewart is right about CNN’s potential, but I believe a lot of international viewers maintain that it is still the “classier” of the news broadcasters out there. I don’t think international audiences are too concerned with the kind of squabbling American politics that draws ratings and attention, but CNN could certainly do plenty to flex their muscle within the United States.

I do not always agree with the opinions of FOX News and at times, CNN’s more amicable nature makes for more comforting television but it is the strong views of the  Sean Hannitys, Bill O’Reillys and Jon Stewarts of the world that make their voices memorable.

________________________________

This article sources material from Talking Points MemoThe Atlantic Wire and video originally by ScarceClips.

Standard